Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit

Row 1 Fact

IVC filters are medical devices used to intercept and trap blood clots. The devices commonly are used in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung). IVC filters can be used either permanently or on a temporary basis. The use of the devices has exploded in recent years, with projections of 259,000 implantations in 2012 (compared to 167,000 in 2007).


Check Mark

O’Steen MacLeod Combs PLC is recognized by Best Lawyers as one of the top law firms in America. Our firm was designated as a Tier 1 law firm in Personal Injury Litigation in the organization’s “Best Law Firms” rankings for 2025.


Court House

For more than 50 years, our lawyers have assisted victims of medical malpractice receive everything they deserve for their losses.


RECORD SETTING

$5 billion
recovered
for our
clients

LARGEST LANDMARK CASE
IN HISTORY

SELECTED BY
ARIZONA
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
TO FIGHT
AGAINST BIG TOBACCO
AND WON

FDA Warns Doctors About Use of Bard IVC Filters

August 9, 2010—The FDA warned that IVC filters could fracture and migrate to other parts of the body. The FDA announced that it had received 921 adverse event reports since 2005 involving IVC filters, including devices manufactured by C.R. Bard. Problems included device migration, detachment of device parts, filter fracture and perforation of the inferior vena cava.

The FDA warning coincided with a report released in the Archives of Internal Medicine linking IVC filters manufactured by C.R. Bard with these defects. The study evaluated eighty patients who received two different types of C.R. Bard IVC filters at York Hospital. Twenty-eight patients received an older model that was available from April 2003 through October 2005. Among that group, seven experienced a filter fracture, reflecting a 25% fracture rate. Of the 52 patients who received the Bard G2 model, six patients experienced a fracture, representing a 12% rate of fracture.

At first blush the fracture rates in the Bard G2 IVC filter, seem to demonstrate an improvement over the older model, however the average time of implantation and fracture was about 50 months for patients with the older device compared to about 24 months for patients with the Bard G2 filter.

Our Awards

For a free, confidential case evaluation:

Contact Us White Box